Maine Legislature ought to reverse BEP motion on clear automobiles
The BDN Opinion part operates independently and doesn’t set information insurance policies or contribute to reporting or modifying articles elsewhere within the newspaper or on bangordailynews.com.
Matthew Gagnon of Yarmouth is the chief government officer of the Maine Coverage Institute, a free market coverage suppose tank primarily based in Portland. A Hampden native, he beforehand served as a senior strategist for the Republican Governors Affiliation in Washington, D.C.
150 signatures.
That’s 0.011 % of Maine’s 1.36 million residents. That’s all it took for environmental teams to drive the consideration of a coverage that has the potential to fully reshape the financial system of the state. That’s all it took for particular pursuits to seemingly import a controversial rule from the progressive political dreamland of California.
On Tuesday, the Maine Board of Environmental Safety agreed, in a 4-2 vote, to direct the Maine Division of Environmental Safety to push ahead with the preparation of a rule that might part out, by authorities mandate, the sale of gas-powered automobiles in Maine.
This new rule, initially proposed by the Pure Assets Council of Maine and different environmentalist allies, wanted no legislative scrutiny to be thought-about. That’s as a result of, as I detailed in early August, the guiding rules which are into account for change are designated as “routine technical” guidelines, which is a governmental gobbledegook definition that obscures our understanding of how modifications are made. What it means is {that a} small variety of unelected bureaucrats, not the individuals we elect to legislate in Augusta, get to resolve on modifications. All they actually wanted was these 150 signatures.
Of curiosity is that Gov. Janet Mills herself has claimed to be against this type of proposal, although I’ve by no means actually trusted her pronouncements on the difficulty. In August of final yr — whereas working for re-election, it ought to be famous — she acknowledged, in reference to California’s draconian electrical car mandates, “I might not be inclined to undertake any mandate alongside these strains.” As a substitute, she stated that she wished to “make electrical automobiles accessible, rebates accessible — however not a mandate.”
That was then, however now that her re-election has been secured, we’ve already seen how critically (or not critically) she takes her guarantees. She promised to manipulate in partnership and collaboration with Republicans and did precisely the other with a state finances in 2021. She promised that she wouldn’t push modifications to Maine’s abortion legislation to make them extra radical, and but she did. And he or she promised Mainers she wouldn’t assist tax will increase, after which did precisely that along with her assist for paid household and medical go away.
However on the planet of damaged guarantees, that is essentially the most insidious, as a result of she will be able to declare that she isn’t accountable for her phrases not being true. In any case, it wasn’t her administration that made this determination, and it wasn’t a chunk of laws that was sponsored by her workplace that did this. So how may we ever dream of her being complicit on this about-face?
Nicely, the Maine Board of Environmental Safety is stacked with individuals who have been appointed or reappointed — all of them — by Mills, seemingly greasing the skids for quiet passage of radical change.
Was that the intent all alongside? I don’t know, and there’s no option to know. However what I do know is that the rhetoric of reasonable, cheap environmental coverage that was against the novel mandates of Californians seems to be at odds with the ideology of the individuals she appointed, who made this determination to advance (however not but undertake) this proposal.
Make no mistake, the rule, as soon as formally adopted, will basically remake the Maine financial system. The “Superior Clear Automobiles II” rule mandates that electrical automobiles make up a sure share of the brand new gross sales of passenger automobiles in Maine. The mandate would require 43 % of gross sales by 2027, after we are at simply 6 % at present. It might then enhance to 82 % by 2032.
Do the particular pursuits pushing this, or the activist bureaucrats supporting it care concerning the probably crippling monetary value of this to the patron in Maine? Are they apprehensive concerning the environmental impression of mining for lithium, or the carbon footprint of the electrical energy technology that’s powering these automobiles? Do they care that Maine seemingly may have a larger impression on the surroundings for a decrease value by attempting to bridge to electrical automobiles by encouraging the manufacturing and buy of extra hybrids?
No, it doesn’t appear so. It seems to be to me that it’s extra necessary to be doing the bidding of a slender constituency of special-interest activists.
The bureaucrats that made this determination didn’t give sufficient consideration to why customers are usually not adopting electrical automobiles. BEP members have as an alternative apparently determined that buyers are behaving irrationally for not doing so. Their answer is to finally drive automobile sellers to promote a product with out a developed market, and to drive customers to purchase one thing they don’t need, or can’t afford.
The Maine Legislature can not permit this to face, and should act to oppose this determination.
